The Terminator franchise comes back with what is supposed to be the first part in a new trilogy.
This movie's basic concept is pretty much what you always wanted as a kid - one totally set in the future. This was of course, what we're not meant to have.
Christian Bale being cast gives them film some 'before you see it' credibility - but director McG's past catalogue of both Charlies Angels movies, and TV series Fastlane - not to mention the fact that I'd first heard of his name as the director to the Offspring's Pretty Fly For A White Guy, spells 'this is going to be shit' all over it before you get through the door.
Throw in king of ham, Michael Ironside (who'd already starred alongside Bale in that crazy dedication to eating indie thinker, The Machinist) - a couple of other no-namers - no Arnie, no Linda Hamilton...surely the razzies need to get ready?
BUT
It's actually damn good! It's no T2 - but then it was never going to be. Bale's role, played like a slightly shoutier one of that in Reign of Fire, is the John Connor we all believed Kyle & Sarah's son would be from the original Terminator.
Sam Worthington actually shares the screen time pretty heavily with Christian - the smaller stars don't get an unnecessary amount of screen time either - e.g. John's wife Kate. If you looked at their characters from T3 - you'd believe they'd had a guts transfusion from each other. Elfman's score, here and there it's classic action movie Elfman - but with some very nicely borrowed cues from Brad Fiedel's original scores.
Quite a surprise, quite fun - maybe T5 can be to Terminator Salvation what T2 was to Terminator. Now I'm allowed to start getting my hopes up!
In sports, I always route for the little guy. It's always great to see a driver take his first win - there's something about watching them enjoying their first success that just brings that warm glow to me.
Okay, that's all a lie, it's just that I like seeing the guy who's now becoming so full of himself get beaten by a rookie or a no-hoper that's been in F1 too long.
This season though, I'm being treated to a whole season of it. After five wins I should be getting bored of Jenson's almost continuous string of victories - and indeed it's true, I'm still hoping for that Webber or Glock victory - but I can certainly live without McLaren or Ferrari taking the top step again for a bit.
Let's face it. Jenson was a no-hoper. This is Jenson's 10th season in Formula 1. In relative terms, he'd seem like a full time member of the old guard, if he didn't have Rubens Barrichello as his team mate - who first raced against Sterling Moss in the 60's.
However, both drivers we know have speed and ability - Flavio's bitchy comments about how F1's been spoiled because the new drivers aren't getting a chance because of the Brawn GP, Williams & Toyota diffuser issue (though worthless, as he's being thrashed by Red Bull, who didn't have this type of diffuser but do have the same Renault engines!) - do highlight something. Is F1 ageist these days?
Mansell's first championship season came 12 years into his career (this popped into my head on his grid interview). At the moment, everything needs to happen so quickly for a F1 driver. This isn't necessarily a good thing.
They have to start karting around the womb, when born, climb info a F3 car and get big F1 team backing all the way through the GP2 or World Series by Renault support series before starting test driving for F1 teams when they get to junior school. This rushed approach leads us to such defects as Lewis Hamilton - a racing driver devoid of humility, personality and passion - just a speed machine with limited intellect.
So, with Button now swapping roles as Britain's best driver, I've suddenly become more appreciative of the guy who I once considered cockey - as next to Lewis he's almost self-effacing!
It's quite incredible to just look back to December and the BBC News story running about the Honda team's withdrawal, with Jenson & Rubens becoming the first victims of the credit crunch in motorsport pretty much - now here smashing the competition in a car Honda paid for but is getting none of the credit for - by picking their cash savings too poorly. Instead of revelling at the front of a multi-manufacturer field in the pinnacle of motorsport, they run around on their own at the head of the American Sportscar series, with almost no competition besides a few independant entries - and supply all of the engines in the flagging Indycar series with literally no competition.
The racing's becoming quite normal now after a couple of races of excitement, and Brawn GP do basically hold the dominance that McLaren had before them...but with the incredible backstory, and a hero we can love far more easily than test tube racing driver Lewis Hamilton - it's still quite a joy to watch Button (and even Rubens when it happens) take all these victories. Carry on the new F1 - and don't screw it all up now Max!
...I'm looking forward to seeing Placebo tomorrow!
The tetris sample is hilarious...hope to hear loads of new tracks - and a couple of oldies...fingers crossed for...
Will tick the ones I actually get to hear tomorrow.
Edit: Two out of Eight only :( - But loads of new tracks!
A computer game based on a battle that took place in Iraq in 2004 has been shelved due to protests.
The main argument behind this is that it's too soon to trivilise such a tramatising event, particularly for the families of those (38 Americans) killed in the conflict (the fact the game involves killing people isn't an issue by the way).
Which raises the question...
How long can you wait then?
Is it expected that we wait until they've forgotten about it, or when they've died? What's the special formula?
The bulk of the Call of Duty franchise is based on WWII warfare - lets face it, WWII games have been being made for absolutely ages - and plenty more people were directly impacted and are fare more likely to come across this game than the 38 families of those killed in Iraq - at least for the next 15 years I guess.
What's the word I'm looking for. It may just be bloody stupid actually.
Link: CNET Article
Just practicing taking political numpties out of context - but then again, I'm not sure it is!
...it's the beauty inside that counts.
Well, not according to this competition - in fact the five judging criteria are appearance, charisma, expression, image concept/setting and 'that something special'.
And if you're voted the cute kid 2009, you win $25,000 towards college tuition!
Well yes, obviously it's time the British application of the term 'only in America'.
TheCuteKid.com (no it's not a paedo-flickr...I think) - runs this lovely little contest - it's a web based beauty pagent for children it seems...hmmm, maybe it is a paedo-flickr.
I'm going to proudly risk saying I don't think we'd allow this in Britain, it just seems mean?
Oh oh, what's that siren sound...oh shit...

Recent Comments